Howestreet.com - the source for market opinions

ALWAYS CONSULT YOUR INVESTMENT PROFESSIONAL BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION

October 7, 2020 | Prince Charles calls for Military Action-like Plan to Prevent Climate Change

Martin Armstrong

Martin Arthur Armstrong is the former chairman of Princeton Economics International Ltd. He is best known for his economic predictions based on the Economic Confidence Model, which he developed.

Prince Charles, who also has no qualifications with climate change, has come out and proposes a military-style response reminiscent of the U.S. Marshall Plan to combat Climate Change. Prince Charles is in league with Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates who has been behind using this virus as the excuse to lock down the world to stop air travel and commuting to work. He agrees with the clock erected in New York City claims we will die after 7 years because of irreversible climate change when in fact NASA confirms that CO2 accounts for only 0.04% of the atmosphere. They continue to call anyone who dares to disagree “conspiracy theorists” so they do not have to answer the mountain of evidence that shows the planet has warmed and gone cold for millions of years without humans driving to work. Not a single one of these people will explain the climate changes that have brought even ice ages.

Meanwhile, Charles trappes around with so many military medals they look like costume jewelry since he has never seen and military combat. He wears no medals for valor in combat. Instead, he wears the appropriate regalia, given his service, ranks in the Navy and Air Force, and appropriate titles. He wears the Order of Merit, the Order of the Bath, and the Queen’s Service Order, all for service to the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth but not for military action. This is the very symbol of climate change. Fancy medals, but nothing for actual science.

STAY INFORMED! Receive our Weekly Recap of thought provoking articles, podcasts, and radio delivered to your inbox for FREE! Sign up here for the HoweStreet.com Weekly Recap.

October 7th, 2020

Posted In: Armstrong Economics

One Comment

  • Peter Brimacombe says:

    “Not a single one of these people will explain the climate changes that have brought even ice ages.“

    we were up in the Gatineau’s on the weekend. We sat on chairs and the chairs were on rock – we could see the rock had been visibly scored by the glaciers. 22,000 years ago all of Canada was covered by glaciers. Glaciation is obvious. The obvious explanation is the sun’s radiation decreased so the snow didn’t melt and became glaciers. What if the sun’s radiation is decreasing but the temperature of the earth stays the same because of the effect of carbon dioxide? If that were true, there would be climate change because the pattern of radiation absorption is changed. The poles would warm up. Which is what we observe. And there would be no glaciers. Which is what we observe.

Post a Comment:

Your email address will not be published.

All Comments are moderated before appearing on the site

*
*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.