Howestreet.com - the source for market opinions

ALWAYS CONSULT YOUR INVESTMENT PROFESSIONAL BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION

December 20, 2021 | Why Austrian School of Economics is Outdated

Martin Armstrong

Martin Arthur Armstrong is the former chairman of Princeton Economics International Ltd. He is best known for his economic predictions based on the Economic Confidence Model, which he developed.

QUESTION: Marty; would you comment on David Stockman’s insistence that the fundamental consequence of 30 years of Fed-fueled financial asset inflation is that the prices of stocks and bonds have way overshot the mark.

Thank you

HW

ANSWER: David Stockman was the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (1981–1985) under President Ronald Reagan. He is very old-school and such a statement in economics is like pretending we are still in the world of horse & buggies and you must pull your new-fangled car off the road if it frightens the horses.

The statement presumes everything in the economy is driven exclusively by domestic events. It’s not his fault. They still teach these theories in universities. It is all based upon the old world of Austrian Economics which dates back to when the exchange rate among nations was based solely on the metal content of their coinage. At that point in economic history, no single nation truly provided the dominant monetary system. There were coins that emerged such as the Anglo-Saxon sceats. But they did not carry a premium because of their economic power.


It wasn’t until the 8th century that the French developed the silver denier copying the Roman silver denarius. This became the main coinage of Europe. But once again, it did not carry a premium because of its economic power.

We find that the English King Offa copied the French and created what became known as the English silver penny. This really established forex exchange rates based entirely upon the metal content not the military power or dominance of any one nation-state.

By the 13th century, this is where we begin to see the dominant gold florin of Florence become the more recognized high-value denomination that became a recognized monetary unit of Europe. Other nations then began to issue imitations of the gold florin.

Indeed, we begin to see other nation-states imitate the gold Florin copying the design. This illustrated that the coin itself became the dominant monetary unit in international commerce. They were not counterfeits, but imitations.

We can see that 600 years later, England issued a silver Florin which represented 24 pence. Florence achieved its independence in 1250 and began to issue the first gold coin for Europe post-Dark Age. The gold Florin was worth 20 silver Grosso. So we can see the gradual inflation whereby the 19th century an English Florin was 24 pence. Equivalent in value of the English Florin was 10 Florins equaled a pound. Even the Hungarian Forint was a reference to the gold Florin of Florence, home of the Medici bank.

The German bankers, the Fuggers, emerged as the leading Augsburg merchant-banker, who then provided loans to local rulers secured with the silver produce of their mines. Eventually, by 1525, the Joachimsthaler of the Kingdom of Bohemia was the first thaler ideally with a weight of 31 grams or one troy ounce. This too became the standard and other nation-states adopted this metal standard issuing one-ounce silver coins. This became the standard even in Spain with the 8 reales which was adopted in America.

 

The wealth of Spain was consumed by Europe but it did not become the dominant currency. In America, the Spanish coinage became dominant and the one-ounce silver coin modeled on the Thaler (8 reales) became the model for the US dollar which was a rejection of the British monetary system.

The Austrian School was based upon Gresham’s Law whereby the debasement of the coinage of Henry VIII drove the higher silver content coinage out of circulation. These ideas were entrenched in a period where there was no dominant financial capital of the world. What is missing from this view of money is that of the economic power of the state. It is this flaw that has made Austrian Economics outdated.

There are “imitations” of ancient Greek and Roman coins where the metal content is on par and sometimes even heavier. This proves that gold in the form of a Roman coin carried a premium to simply raw gold or had that peripheral state-issued gold or silver coinage in its own name. This is the same human reaction in imitating the gold Florin of Florence.

Here we have an Athenian Silver Tetradrachm which became a world currency imitated by Egypt for external trade when Egypt did not issue their own coinage until they were conquered by Alexander the Great more than 100 years later.

Even the Celts of Europe imitated the coinage of Macedonia. What is missing from the entire Austrian School is that a currency can emerge to be worth more than its metal content based upon its economic power.

It was the British pound that emerged as the dominant world currency because of its economic power and imperialism. We then find bonds issued by even China in British pounds just as today nations issue debt in US dollars denominations. It was Britain that stumbled into the same facts which made Rome the glorious empire. In both cases, the lands that they had conquered were able to sell products to the core economy. They both spread culture and created an economic empire that benefited all member states.

Today, in the realm of paper money, fiat is no longer a viable theory. Japan, Germany, and China, all rose from the ashes to become major world economies without gold or tangible resources. What has emerged is the value of a currency is based upon the economic productivity of a nation. That is what backs a currency – nothing else. This Keynesian view of interest rates and money supply are no longer key factors when the dollar is used around the world and even 70% of the paper dollars circulate outside the USA. Obvious ancient Macedonian coins circulated in Celtic Europe just as Roman gold coins were in Asia.

The rise in the stock market has NOTHING to do with this nonsense of the Fed. This statement entirely ignores the fiscal spending that the Fed cannot control. Capital rushes around the world and concentrates at times in a country for a profit. When it does, it increases the domestic money supply when a foreigner buys stocks, bonds, or property in your country.

The Roaring Twenties took place BECAUSE of World War I. The capital fled Europe seeking safe harbor in the USA. That increased the dollar and dollar investments. The inflows peak with the peak in real estate in 1927.

So sorry! This idea that the market is up solely because of the creation of money is just absurd. The propaganda of the socialists that capitalism was evil following the Great Depression, which they did not understand, led to investment concentrating on bonds and equities were “speculative” evil things of gamblers. This led to the Take-Over Boom of the 1980s, which I was blamed for because I was advising takeover buyers based on these charts that showed the low in the book value of the Dow in 1977. Yes, I was advising several takeover tycoons. If you could buy a company, sell its assets, and triple your money, obviously the market was way undervalued following the end of the Public Wave in 1985.

We have to look at the entire world – not just isolated domestic policy. Austrian Economics is from an age long gone when FOREX was based solely upon the metal content. There was no major economic power when Sir Thomas Gresham established his law. An in-depth review of the monetary history of the world clearly established that Austrian Economics is simply based on a period void of economic dominance.

STAY INFORMED! Receive our Weekly Recap of thought provoking articles, podcasts, and radio delivered to your inbox for FREE! Sign up here for the HoweStreet.com Weekly Recap.

December 20th, 2021

Posted In: Armstrong Economics

One Comment

  • CrashDavis says:

    For a smart guy you sure come up with some absurd crap sometimes. ‘Economic productivity is all that matters’ my ass.
    If you just look at stock buybacks alone (which were illegal until we gave the FED a Nazi-style power in merger with state-sponsored ‘banks’since 2008 (2001 in large measure) the S&P surge since March2020 is nearly one-half from Fed-funded buybacks. Instead or 4700 we would be at 2800. (and yes, free money from theFED to welfare queen banks, sent to corporate execs with a kicker and counted as corporate debt to cover CEO buybacks and self-dealt options = THE FED FEEDING FAKE EARNINGS AND RIGGING STOCK VALUATIONS UP. Get your head out of your backside Martin. Gamestop rigged up to7 times mkt cap of EXXON (or any of t
    the countless zombie firms} has nothing to do with “economic productivity” or earnings (Gamestops net income is negative 100mill or more for crying out loud.) Blaming theAustrian school or anybody but the FED for that is just choosing to be an apologist for Satan. Period.

Post a Comment:

Your email address will not be published.

All Comments are moderated before appearing on the site

*
*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.