Howestreet.com - the source for market opinions

ALWAYS CONSULT YOUR INVESTMENT PROFESSIONAL BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION

October 10, 2025 | Canadian Pipelines: Good Bad Ugly and Nightmares

Hilliard MacBeth

Author of "When the Bubble Bursts: Surviving the Canadian Real Estate Crash"

Pipelines: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Another pipeline fantasy rises from the political graveyard.

Premier Danielle Smith is pitching a “ghost” pipeline to the West Coast — no sponsor, no permits, vague route, no funding. It’s Northern Gateway all over again.

Canada’s pipeline history is a mix of ambition, divisive politics, and staggering cost overruns.

Which projects are good, bad, or ugly?


Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX)

Ugly — and then some.
The expansion added about 500,000 barrels a day from Edmonton to Burnaby, now rated at 890,000 bpd. Ottawa bought it for C$4.5 billion, then watched costs explode to C$34 billion. Only one-third will be recovered from industry. Taxpayers could be on the hook for as much as C$19 billion. Add expensive tolls and marine bottlenecks — TMX is a financial nightmare.


Keystone XL (KXL)

This one could have been good.
The 830,000-bpd line from Hardisty to Steele City was under construction when President Biden pulled the plug in 2021. Alberta lost C$1.5 billion. TransCanada (now South Bow) wrote off US$2.2 billion and sued the U.S. for US$15 billion under NAFTA.
KXL was Alberta’s cleanest shot at expanding sales.


Northern Gateway

The ugliest of all.
Approved in 2014 with 209 conditions, this twin-line (525,000 bpd westbound; 193,000 bpd dilbit eastbound) ran into fierce First Nation opposition and the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act. Politically radioactive and logistically impossible.


Energy East

Just plain bad.
A 1.1 million bpd, C$15.7 billion plan to move oil to New Brunswick — but weak demand, massive opposition. Dead on arrival.


So, what’s left?

Canada exports about 4.2 million bpd of crude — almost all to the U.S.
The Enbridge Mainline and Lakehead systems carry 3.2 million bpd at just US$5–9 per barrel, the cheapest route by far.

The U.S. imports 6 million bpd (60% from Canada), produces 13.5 million, uses 20 million, and exports 4 million. There’s no better market.

Smith’s “ghost” pipeline faces heavy headwinds — tanker bans, Indigenous opposition, runaway costs, and zero private support. A potential nightmare like Northern Gateway.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Mark Carney met with President Trump this week, reportedly reopening the Keystone XL file.

Trump posted in February 2025:

“The Trump Administration is very different — Easy approvals, almost immediate start! We want the Keystone XL Pipeline built.”

South Bow, operator of the existing Keystone line, said earlier this year it had “moved on,” but now hints it’s “exploring ways to leverage existing pipeline corridors.”

If anything moves forward, a revived Keystone XL is the best of the bunch — same corridor, same customer, fewer headaches, potential private sector sponsor.


Verdict

Good: Keystone XL revival (if it happens)
Bad: Energy East
Ugly: Trans Mountain
Ugliest: Northern Gateway
Ghostly: Smith’s new fantasy


Hilliard MacBeth

The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Richardson Wealth or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The comments contained herein are general in nature and are not intended to be, nor should be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular individual. Accordingly, individuals should consult their own legal or tax advisors for advice with respect to the tax consequences to them, having regard to their own particular circumstances.. Richardson Wealth is a member of Canadian Investor Protection Fund. Richardson Wealth is a trademark by its respective owners used under license by Richardson Wealth.

STAY INFORMED! Receive our Weekly Recap of thought provoking articles, podcasts, and radio delivered to your inbox for FREE! Sign up here for the HoweStreet.com Weekly Recap.

October 10th, 2025

Posted In: Hilliard's Weekend Notebook

Post a Comment:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All Comments are moderated before appearing on the site

*
*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.