- the source for market opinions


January 4, 2019 | The Prediction Racket

Lobo Tiggre, aka Louis James, is the founder and CEO of Louis James LLC, and the principal analyst and editor of the Independent Speculator. He researched and recommended speculative opportunities in Casey Research publications from 2004 to 2018, writing under the name “Louis James.” While with Casey Research, he learned the ins and outs of resource speculation from the legendary speculator Doug Casey. Although frequently mistaken for one, Mr. Tiggre is not a professional geologist. However, his long tutelage under world-class geologists, writers, and investors resulted in an exceptional track record. The average of the yearly gains published for the flagship Casey publication, the International Speculator, was 18.5% per year during Tiggre’s time with the publication. A fully transparent, documented, and verifiable track record is a central feature of services going forward. Another key feature is that Mr. Tiggre will put his own money into the speculations he writes about, so his readers will always know he has “skin in the game” with them

This is a time of year when all sort of pundits make predictions. The S&P 500 is going to 3,000! Or 2,000! Gold is going to $1,400! Or $700!

I confess that when I first started out in this business, I made gold price forecasts as well. I outgrew it. You see, no matter how much math and fancy verbiage an analyst throws into generating a number, it’s always still a guess—and it’s irresponsible to pretend it’s more.

At best, such guesses are useless. But the more impressive the verbiage, the more dangerous they are, because they are still guesses based on assumptions. Both the assumptions and the logic behind the guess can be wrong, and either on its own can be fatal. Combined, they can destroy fortunes.

And yet, if some famous person projects some specific and impressive number, it can encourage investors to act as though they have more reliable knowledge of the future than they really do.

What makes matters worse is that there’s little consequence for the talking heads in financial media when they make bold guesses that turn out to be wrong. However, there’s great incentive for them to keep guessing in public as aggressively as they dare. The bolder the forecast, the more exciting the headline. That sells copy, and by the time we find out of the pundit was right or wrong, it’s too late for the investors suckered in.

One day, in my copious spare time, I’d like to launch a website dedicated to tracking and keeping score on the forecasts, projections, quant predictions, technical outlooks, and other guesses that flood the financial press. It could be like Every time some talking head in the financial news makes some grandiose guess, it’s noted and the results are tracked. So in the future, when this happens, investors can look up the success ratio of serial public guessers.

Meanwhile, what I can do is refuse to join in the prediction racket.

So, no, I don’t have a gold price forecast for 2019. Nor uranium. Nor anything else.

To say that I expect both uranium and gold to head higher this year (and the energy minerals as well, if the trade war ends) is as far out on a limb as I’m willing to go. And I won’t pretend it’s not a guess, just because it’s based on many years of experience and my current market observations. That’s not for lack of courage, but because I don’t want to pretend to know more than I do.

Just getting the direction right will be more than enough for my readers and me to make money. That’s enough for me.

As always, caveat emptor,

STAY INFORMED! Receive our Weekly Recap of thought provoking articles, podcasts, and radio delivered to your inbox for FREE! Sign up here for the Weekly Recap.

January 4th, 2019

Posted In: Louis James

Post a Comment:

Your email address will not be published.

All Comments are moderated before appearing on the site


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.