- the source for market opinions


December 11, 2017 | The British Columbia Government has made a Principled and Responsible Decision to Support Site C’s Completion

Stewart Muir is founder and executive director of the Resource Works Society, a Vancouver-based group open to participation by British Columbians from all walks of life who are concerned about their future economic opportunities. He is an author, journalist and historian with experience on three continents including a financial editor of The Vancouver Sun responsible for mining and markets coverage. Since Resource Works was established in 2014, the group has gained international recognition for its practical approach to the public challenges of responsible natural resource development and use.

After reviewing the Site C hydro project, British Columbia’s decision to keep going to completion is an important step in a long-term energy transition. Stewart Muir looks at the issue.


The Site C dam being constructed in North East B.C. is a relatively minor project when compared to the nearby W.A.C. Bennett Dam, which was finished in 1968 and can produce 2.6 times more electricity than Site C will. But with today’s increased weight of public issues like clean energy, indigenous rights and the environment, Site C has oten seemed like a much larger project than it really is.

In coming to its decision, the provincial cabinet sought a wide spectrum of perspectives and clearly did much soulsearching before landing where it did. Responsible economic growth, powered by clean electricity from a hydroelectric source, is the goal of the Site C decision.

In December 2017, the British Columbia government has made a principled and responsible decision to support Site C’s completion.

There are real consequences whenever the landscape is disturbed on a mass scale, and it is up to the dam’s builders, managers and regulators to ensure that the promised mitigations are successfully applied.

If it is completed on schedule by 2024, Site C will be just a small part of Canada’s overall push into a great escalation of electric capacity as society decarbonizes. In 2014, the Joint Review Panel looking at the project concluded that Site C “would produce more power per gram of CO2e than any alternative (non-nuclear) over its lifetime.” A single LNG plant or large mine could alone consume the output of Site C. By 2024, Canadians will be confronting a legion of other complicated energy decisions dictated by the country’s commitment to lowering its greenhouse gas emissions.

According to one recent report by Trottier Energy Futures Project, a collaborative effort by the Canadian Academy of Engineering and the David Suzuki Foundation, the challenges ahead of Canadians between now and 2050 include:

  • An 80% GHG reduction
  • Ensuring access to carbon-free electrical generation, interjurisdictional transfers of electricity, and storage
  • Attracting a massive amount of infrastructure investment immediately
  • Giving attention to all sources of non-combustion emissions

Trottier estimated that Canada would need 16 nuclear power stations like Bruce Power to make the leap to 2050 – or 6,300 solar farms or 2,500 wind farms. Providing the equivalent of this much electricity is a truly monumental challenge.

Those who lament Site C moving forward must acknowledge that British Columbia is not a walled-off statelet within Canada, but rather it has an important role to play in the national picture. The North East of B.C. is an energy powerhouse that offers numerous diverse and desirable energy sources. Most of the province’s best wind potential is here, and with the right storage solutions in place there may be potential for solar as well. Its abundant shale gas is the most commercially significant energy asset B.C. possesses in 2017 and it is inevitably going to play a major part in the overall Canadian energy transition because it is the only realistic way that GHG-intensive provinces like Alberta can meet their decarbonization goals as quickly as they need to.

The recent public conversation on Site C taught us some important lessons.

First of all, a clear (albeit sometimes slender) majority of residents recognizes that doing the right thing may be difficult but it’s also necessary.

Secondly, it reaffirms that indigenous and environmental issues must be handled effectively for any new energy projects to proceed in future.

As Metro Vancouver grows, so too will its need for electrical energy. That electricity must be responsibly sourced, and it is inevitable that this means some amount of ecological disturbance regardless of what the specific energy solutions are. The Site C controversy will not be the last of its kind. We are going to have to get much better at curating balanced public discussions so that majority-supported viewpoints are not drowned out by high-volume pressure or backroom maneuvrings. At Resource Works, our Community Conversations project showed that it’s possible for citizens with diverse and sometimes conflicting points of view to respect one another and work together. In the years ahead, this approach will be more important than ever before.

Stewart Muir is executive director of the Resource Works Society.



STAY INFORMED! Receive our Weekly Recap of thought provoking articles, podcasts, and radio delivered to your inbox for FREE! Sign up here for the Weekly Recap.

December 11th, 2017

Posted In: Resource Works

Post a Comment:

Your email address will not be published.

All Comments are moderated before appearing on the site


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.