Howestreet.com - the source for market opinions

ALWAYS CONSULT YOUR INVESTMENT PROFESSIONAL BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION

August 29, 2017 | Fair is Fair

A best-selling Canadian author of 14 books on economic trends, real estate, the financial crisis, personal finance strategies, taxation and politics. Nationally-known speaker and lecturer on macroeconomics, the housing market and investment techniques. He is a licensed Investment Advisor with a fee-based, no-commission Toronto-based practice serving clients across Canada.

More on Justin’s historic slitting and gutting of the entrepreneurial class or, as he calls it, “fairness.”

First a word about the comment section which two days ago turned into the equivalent of a coked-up knife fight among rival biker gangs (of accountants). As regular addicted readers will know, we recently debated whether the steerage area of this blog was out of control and needed cops, filters or just a muzzle. You offered your thoughts. They were analyzed by a crack team of advisors (thanks, Bandit) and a conclusion was reached. The comments stay. There’ll be no tiered responses and no ability for people to pile on a single poster. No Trumpian bullying. No registration form, either. All deplorables may stay anonymous. And the membership fee remains the same. It’s tax-deductible.

What did thus week’s debate here show? Simply, that the above works.

Yeah, a few moronic comments were deleted, some salty language was cleansed and a number of flagrantly stupid posts deserved a rectifying footnote. But the debate here – of those who think T2’s assault on doctors, plumbers and IT guys is outrageous, and those who believe everyone should be an employee, all dollars are equal and successful folks are tax criminals – was healthy. The formal is chronological, as opposed to logical. Readers can scroll through a variety of thoughts from a wide cross-section of people – those making $26,000 to half a million, from commies to tories. Thus it shall stay for a while. Just don’t threaten me or I’ll sulk.

Meanwhile there are 35 days remaining in the seventy-five day summer consultation period the Department of Finance has declared before the tax rules on small business are drastically altered. This week the Bill-what-the-hell-are-you-doing? campaign kicked into high gear with finance minister Bill Morneau being besieged with taxpayer letters, accountant protests and lobbying efforts from farmer groups to manufacturers. Suddenly the issue of ‘fairness’ doesn’t look so fair through the eyes of those whose ox is about to be gored.

This is worth a second post this week. So here’s is what two of you had to tell our government:

From James, in Oakville:

Hey Bill: I quit my job at age 36 when my wife was 6 months pregnant with our first child to start a business.  Borrowed no money from the bank, doubtful they would have given me any with no University degree and no 50 page business plan.  But with a lot of hard work and lean times my business partner and I have built a pretty successful business over the last 10 years.  We now employ over a dozen staff and are continuing to slowly grow.  We pay a LOT of taxes.  Six figures of payroll remittances every month, six figures of HST every quarter, over $50k of EHT a year, $24k in property tax every year (we bought some office space rather than paying rent and struggled taking less personal income for 6 years to save a down payment).  We each pay a huge pile of personal tax each year –  $161,683.84 myself in payroll deductions YTD plus another $33,398 in tax installments.   I will likely end the year somewhere around $225k in personal tax.  Never mind that I will pay another $40k in HST on all the things we buy to live our lives.  Thank goodness the wife discovered boxed wine recently Bill, that LCBO budget is a killer.

I work a lot of hours as you can imagine.  As a small business I have to look after operations, HR, finance, sales, tech support, recruiting, training and coaching of staff, etc. etc.  My wife left her job two years ago to look after our 2 young daughters because I could not be there as much as she needed me to.  I was too busy trying to be an entrepreneur.  She played a large roll in the start-up of the business – can you imagine many pregnant wives encouraging their husbands to quit their very secure job of over 10 years to start a new business?  She also has been a huge support over the last decade and we talk about the business every single day.  She is full of ideas and helps me very much.  After running this little gig for 9 years we finally got to the point where my business partner and I each opened new hold co’s and just this year started to pay our spouses some dividends as payment for their decade of supporting the start-up and growth of this small business.  You don’t think this is fair apparently.  You don’t feel my family is contributing enough tax to the country apparently.  I will tell you Bill that I think it IS fair that my wife is compensated and that we can save a little tax.  We are already contributing FAR more than our fair share.  Because we took a risk and started a business, the coffers of CRA see a couple of million dollars a year in extra taxes.  We have no pensions, I am not covered by employment insurance.  I pay $5,000 a year for disability insurance and what do you think will happen to this business if something happens to me Bill?  There was a massive amount of risk starting this business.  What are the rewards?  Long hours?  Stress?  Never taking a single vacation in 10 year without my laptop and phone and several hours of work every day, 7 days a week?  Oh there was a small reward with spousal dividends we just started taking advantage of but you don’t feel that is fair.

My thoughts today are that I will probably just give up trying to grow this business much from here.   My wife and I have always lived beneath our means.  We gave up a lot of luxuries in live to avoid debt and we paid off our mortgage 7 years ago.  We live in house we paid $580,000 for Bill, no swanky mansions with housekeepers for this small business owner.   We always maxed out our RRSPS and have built a decent little nest egg so even with no fat government pensions I guess we will be ok.  No French Fry money for this guy.  Just a lean paycheque eviscerated by the liberal tax machine.  No trips to Paris, private yachts or helicopters for us Bill.  My wife has a nice Hyundai if you ever need a lift.

From Aman, in Vancouver:

Hi Bill: I’m a business owner and am now, after years of toiling, I am considered to be a high income earner.  I have no pension, no benefits, I took one vacation day off last year because I have no other choice, and I work at least 50 hours per week.   Funny thing is, I don’t feel wealthy or a high earner.

Like tens of thousands of other businesses owners across the country, I pay a tremendous amount of money that benefit other Canadians through salaries to employees,  payments to Canadian suppliers and service providers, regulatory fees to Canadian institutions, and taxes to the Canadian government. No one with an even rudimentary understanding of economics would argue against the benefit that Canadian small businesses have on the economy.

Your new tax proposals are at best discouraging to the entrepreneurial spirit and at worst punitive to those that do so much for the country and have the smallest safety net possible.  I believe your proposals have not recognized that many successful business owners also have failed business under their belt too, or years of student debt and personal capital sacrificed for a dream that benefits all Canadians. Often times small business ownership is forced upon individuals due to a modern trend towards hiring individual contractors as opposed to full time employment (A practice that is alive and well in the Canadian public sector as well)

It is important to emphasize that the entrepreneurial dream that small businesses provide is also one that welcomes all people – there is no gender, ethnic, or other exclusive membership that prevents one to become a business owner.  For a government that prides itself on equality, most would argue that the open path to small business ownership has been the only truly unhindered way for people to receive equal opportunity to achieve their respective economic dreams.

I understand that under the banner of “fairness” these tax rule changes were conceived.  But they are just the opposite.  They are unfair to those who go without rich public sector pensions, unfair to those that take on a tremendous amount of risk while putting food on the tables of many other Canadian households.    Worst of all it is an assault on the incentive to enter one of the only paths that promotes true economic fairness for all.

Please rethink this or I, as well as millions of others that value small businesses, will be responding with our vote.

For or against, you should be part of this conversation, and respond to the feds before the next round of tax changes are carved into stone.

Here is the much-criticized Bill Morneau document on “fair” changes to the way small business are taxed.

And here is how to reach the minister: [email protected] You can find your own MP’s email here. And here is a picture of puppies. Choose wisely.

STAY INFORMED! Receive our Weekly Recap of thought provoking articles, podcasts, and radio delivered to your inbox for FREE! Sign up here for the HoweStreet.com Weekly Recap.

August 29th, 2017

Posted In: The Greater Fool

Post a Comment:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All Comments are moderated before appearing on the site

*
*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.