- the source for market opinions


April 21, 2016 | Market Manipulation

Is author of the newsletter Cycles News and Views and his site which provides investors with a place where they can obtain truthful, non biased, factual information about the financial markets. Tim's primary focus is on the stock market, specifically the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the S&P 500, the Gold market, the Dollar and T-Bonds. The information presented in his website,, is based on technical analysis and not on the Hope and Hype heard by the so-called mainstream "analysts."

Gold and Silver to take a break ?

Listen to Podcast:

STAY INFORMED! Receive our Weekly Recap of thought provoking articles, podcasts, and radio delivered to your inbox for FREE! Sign up here for the Weekly Recap.

Archives April 21st, 2016

Posted In: Radio

One Comment

  • Avatar DaveintheUK says:

    Tim, a question.

    Are you syrew the 9 year cycles in gold and silver always work?

    For instance, in 1980, gold and silver made tops practially on the same day, well it was 21 January 1980 for gold, I belive silver made a couple of tops around that date.

    However, in 2011, silver made its cycle high near $50 in early May. Both gold and silver had a good pullback (well, silver absolutely crashed) into the early summer and then in September, gold made its bull market high, with silver failing to confirm by stalling out at $44. Now I know that is not a year long cycle but there was a clear difference between the gold and silver cycles at that point, even though they were in sync back in 1980.

    I would also like to ask about the 1990s stock market cycles. I saw a graphic that described the stock market cycle from 1990-998 as one single cycle and not two 4 year cycles. That would then be the largest cycle ever (8 years, even longer than the present one). Between 1991 and 1998 there was not a decline in the Dow Jones Industrials (DJIA) that looks at all significant, in fact none that is as large as the 2011 mid-cycle decline that happened in this present 2009 to 2015/2016 bull market. If the 2011 decline was not a cycle low then why is one of the lesser mid-1990s declines a cycle low in Tim’s analysis? I don’t understand this.

    Is it not possible that 1991-1998 was an 8 years cycle and 2009-2016 is also an 8 year cycle? Furthermore, the 1998 decline at the end of that long cycle was not a particularly big one, smaller than the one after 2000 and the one in 2008.

Post a Comment:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All Comments are moderated before appearing on the site


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.