It will be much worse, in many respects.
The chart below, borrowed from Dr. Marc Faber’s Market Commentary
December 1, 2008, is devastating. The chart shows a stunning loss of $30
trillion stock market wealth around the world. By some estimates,
combined losses in commodities, stocks, bonds, real estate are greater
than $60 trillion. This is beyond rescue.
Chart Courtesy Marc Faber Market Commentary
and TheChartstore.com
It is virtually impossible to overstate the dire consequences resulting
from the severity of the declines recently experienced in almost all
asset classes—from both a technical and fundamental viewpoint. From a
fundamental perspective US consumers had come to rely on borrowing
against growing asset prices to sustain their lifestyles. Most of
today’s globally-interconnected economy was based upon growth in the US
consumption. This game has ended badly. Asset dependency will eventually
be replaced by living off of income and savings, but not after we escape
from this disastrous period. As unemployment rises income generation
will become increasingly difficult, and we cannot begin to save until
our mountainous debt is paid off. For most of us, this is the equivalent
of the world being turned upside down on our heads.
From a technical perspective, the picture is equally as dire. Take a
look at the chart below of the Baltic Dry Index and of crude oil.
Collapses of this magnitude do not recover
until after elongated periods of basing and repair – eye-catching,
sharp, short-term bounces, yes; runs back to new highs, no. This is true
for most all commodities with the exception of precious metals. It now
appears that the end of decade “flameout rally” I had been predicting in
previous commentary
here and
here is now in the rear view mirror. The rally did not extend as the
equity rally had the end of last decade because the gains contributed to
a crashing economy and the deleveraging process disproportionately
punished them. Unlike gains in equity prices which tend to extend
economic gains due to the wealth effect, gains in commodities prices
tend to harm economic growth in a stock-market-dependent economy.
Retracement levels (corrections within the bull runs) are common –
typically 38%, 50% and sometimes 62%. Drops exceeding 50% draw a major
red flag and those greater than 62% are “uninvestable” in my playbook.
Having said that, they are not untradeable. In fact, you can register
spectacular gains if you are nimble enough to take advantage of oversold
rallies before the next downtrend.
The point I wish to emphasize here, however, is that the secular uptrend
that has been in place for commodities, real estate and world equities
has ended. Moreover, anything that has not yet crashed most likely will.
The US stock market indices are on the cusp of a major collapse. World
sovereign debt is in the final blow-off phase of their bull runs and
they will be the last to fall. And just before they do, the real mad
scramble to own gold will begin. We are now beginning to see gains in
gold and treasuries, a rare though not unprecedented occurrence.
Equally rare are drops of 48% in the DJIA and S&P 500. Market historians
and technical analysts look to 1929, 1938, and 1974 for comparisons.
1929 marked the beginning of a deflationary depression. The market
dropped in the late fall in bounced almost 50% into the spring of 1930
before dropping another 90% into 1932. 1938 was not quite as perilous as
stocks bounced and stabilized in 1939 and then consolidated and based
until 1942, ending the bear that began in 1929. In the 1974-1975 period
stocks dropped 48% and then actually pivoted higher to challenge the
1968-high by the end of the decade.
I am quick to dismiss drawing a comparison to the 74-75 period because,
though treasury yields slipped lower, they did not go to zero, and there
was minimal debt and deleveraging by comparison. 2008 and 1938 are
similar in that both saw drops of similar magnitude after having
experienced cyclical bull runs which followed a market crash 8 years
prior (2000 and 1929). Where this comparison falls short is that we will
not have experienced a 90% collapse along the way. I believe that such a
collapse is necessary and inevitable. We are therefore likely to have
our 90% correction in 2009 rather than in 1930-32 period. The good news
is that we are likely in the 1938-period in terms of overall duration of
the bear market which means that it will likely end in four years.
The chart below is helpful in illustrating the periods of comparison.
Chart courtesy: The Wall Street Journal
The chart is from a Wall Street Journal article written today by E.S.
Browning titled “Stock Investors Lose Faith, Pull Out Record Amounts”.
One of the great pearls of wisdom Browning shares in the article serves
as a precursor to the stampede out of the market we have yet to
experience: "’For many investors, this has been a glimpse into the
abyss,’ says Terrance Odean, a finance professor at the University of
California, Berkeley, who has studied the behavior of individual
investors. ‘They have been told that if you save regularly for
retirement and buy and hold, you will be fine. Now, people see a
possibility that this will not be the case.’" The hopeless optimists
will once again wrongly argue that the negative sentiment is a bullish
contrarian indicator and that now is time to buy…it’s always time to buy
for them.
The problem is that what investment advisors, chartered financial
analysts, and economists are taught does not apply in the current
environment. If we have learned anything from our current predicament it
is that we cannot rely on the ‘experts for guidance. No, history is our
best teacher. Just as policy-makers knew that they had the tools to
prevent the depression, similar expectations hold for the “dream-team”
of economists Obama has assembled to form his economic policies.
In a December 21 Washington Post article titled “Optimism High About
Obama Policies, Poll Finds” written by Jon Cohen and Jennifer Agiesta we
find that “Most Americans are optimistic about the policies that Barack
Obama will pursue …according to a new Washington Post-ABC News
poll….Majorities think Obama should help make major changes to the
health-care system, enact new energy policies and institute a moratorium
on home foreclosures. Majorities expect him to end U.S. involvement in
Iraq, improve health care and turn around America's image abroad.”
Those polled are in store for major disappointment. Ian Gordon, in The
Long Wave Analyst Special Addition “This is It!” August - November 2007,
warns us:
“Regrettably, many people believe that their leaders can always
positively control the future. It is a mistaken belief that always costs
them dearly. Every market move is always followed by a reaction. The
bigger the up move the bigger the down side. There is no historical
comparison with the sheer magnitude of the worldwide investment mania
that is currently in force. Thus, the down side threatens to rock the
very foundations of capitalism and democracy. As Epicitus put it, ‘the
extreme of any position will ultimately become its opposite.’ As night
follows day, a boom is always followed by a bust; the bigger the boom
the bigger the bust. The bust always catches the majority unawares,
coming as it does from a zenith of apparent prosperity and speculative
excess. At this time, the crowd is imbued with an impetuous fervor
encouraged by the affirmations of its leaders.”
The erroneous interpretation that FDR’s government programs combined
with accommodative monetary policy led us out of the Great Depression
will result in policies that destroy the currency. It is of little value
to debate what should be done, because this is what will be done. Dr.
Marc Faber in his latest Market Commentary correctly surmises, “I have
repeatedly characterized the current economic conditions as comparable
to a war being fought between central banks around the world and the
private sector and that this war is likely to be very protracted and
will lead to high volatility in all asset classes. We have seen that
governments are desperate to support asset markets with “extraordinary”
and unprecedented monetary and fiscal measures…”
The ill-fated measures will fail and do more harm than good. My
interpretation of the charts leads me to conclude that the DJIA will
correct all of the way back down to the level of the start of the last
secular bull market which began in 1982 of 1000. A similar drop to the
100-level in the S&P 500 is to be also be expected. Gold will resort to
its status as a currency and all currencies will deflate against gold.
The price of gold will likely top out at a price higher than $1000/oz as
the ratio of Dow-to-gold dips below 1:1 as indicated in the chart below:
Chart Courtesy: sharelynx.com
I think it will dip to 0.2:1 which would place gold around $5000/oz
which might be enough to peg currencies to account for the world’s
remaining wealth. The sooner they peg, the sooner they stabilize the
loss in wealth. What is missed on many historians is that the Producer
Price Index actually rose throughout the 1930s (moderately) and real
rates remained negative. Real rates are likely to remain positive today
which is why gold will eventually become the last asset class of choice
as those who still have some wealth desperately seek to preserve it.
Faber notes, “…I doubt that considering the large and growing budget
deficits and the costs associated with the various bailouts the US will
ever again have positive real interest rates – at least not until the
system breaks down and a new monetary order is introduced, which will be
run by real central bankers (ideally even without them) and will not be
managed by some academics who in their insanity have become money
printers.”
Many have written that this is not “your garden-variety recession.” We
are well beyond recession terms. This will be worse than your
“Grandfather’s Depression”. It will end with the destruction of the US
dollar as the world’s reserve currency and return us to a gold-backed
world currency regime. A sound world currency will allow us to once
again grow the economy through savings and investment in a sustainable
manner. Ian Gordon observes that:
“The great Austrian School Economist, Ludwig von Mises wrote, ‘There is
no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by
credit expansion. The question is only whether the crisis should come
sooner as a result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit
expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency
system involved.’ There has never been any attempt to abandon the credit
expansion. Indeed any crisis was simply an excuse to open the monetary
spigots. This, then, is the beginning of the total catastrophe of the
American dollar, indeed the entire world monetary and financial
structure.”
Those who continue to place their faith in our policy representatives
will be among the most unprepared as Gordon further cautions:
“That so many people trust in the power of their leaders to offset the
natural progression from boom to bust in the economy is incredible. It
can be demonstrated time and time again that leaders have always failed
in their quest to arrest economic and financial decline. In fact, the
more that these leaders believed in their power to maintain the status
quo, the greater the ultimate damage and the greater the suffering
endured by the people who had blindly placed their trust in them. “
The current period will be more about preserving wealth than creating
it. Your financial plan will require more of an emphasis on paying off
debt, saving, and slashing your budget than it will on investing and
designing a well-crafted diversified portfolio. Most financial advisors
are going to need to be re-trained. Unfortunately for them , many of the
firms they are working for will not exist in a few years.