• Send your dollars on a holiday and watch them return with interest,
• How much does the rest of the world care about the feelings of
  Americans investors?
• Avoiding the snares of the over-gimmicky marketplace and more...

-------------------------

Eric Fry, reporting from Laguna Beach, California...

"As international investors wake up to the relative weakening of America's economic power," The Economist recently remarked, "they will surely question why they hold the bulk of their wealth in dollars...The dollar's decline already amounts to the biggest default in history, having wiped far more off the value of foreigners' assets than any emerging market has ever done."

To us Americans, The Economist's unflattering analysis may feel a bit harsh and unfair. But the rest of the world is starting to care less and less about how we Americans feel. The rest of the world despises losing money, just as much as any American. So when foreign investors watch their dollar-denominated investments tumble in value, they become a little grumpy. And if they become really grumpy, they sell their dollar-denominated assets and take their capital elsewhere.

They take their capital to jurisdictions and asset markets that treat their capital more kindly. They take it to places where the profits are larger and the deceptions are smaller.

American-style capitalism has evolved into a bizarre marriage of financial gimmickry and governmental coddling. Very few companies produce much of anything, other than derivatives and press releases. This situation would not be so bad if the derivatives possessed a bit of value and the press releases possessed a bit of truth. Instead, the U.S. economy lurches from greed to deception to disaster, and back to greed, without ever eliminating all the flaws and the felons that cause all the problems.

When we should be lopping off heads (so to speak), we dispense multi-million dollar severance packages; when we should be marking to market we mark to mark-up; when we should be allowing idiotic speculations to fail we devise new ways to finance idiotic speculations.

But the path to economic salvation and rejuvenation is not so complicated; it begins with truth-telling and real-world pricing.

Just yesterday, for example, HSBC Holdings, Europe's largest bank by market value, agreed to absorb $45 billion of assets from the structured investment vehicles (SIVs) it controls. (For more on this topic, please see the following edition of the Rude Awakening, SIV-Positive ). In other words, the big bank agreed to take responsibility for $45 billion worth of questionable asset-backed securities (ABS).

By contrast, Citigroup has refused to assume direct responsibility for the $83 billion of questionable ABS that it controls inside its SIVs. Instead, America's largest lending institution has concocted an elaborate "Super-SIV" ruse, the purpose of which is to dump the detritus of its ill-conceived financial gimmickry into a vehicle where the floodlight of full disclosure and accountability will never shine.

"I like what HSBC has done," says Ed Ketz, associate professor of accounting at the Smeal College of Business at Pennsylvania State University, "It's a very simple solution. It's one that's transparent. We can see the promise of liquidity. That's something that, to me, would create a feeling of trust. Citi could go a long way in following this example."

Jack Ciesielski, publisher of the industry newsletter The Analyst's Accounting Observer, concurs: "With someone like HSBC throwing in the towel, going for transparency... it makes Citi and the other parties look conspiratorial at this point if they don't 'fess up and do that."

But Citi's maneuvers-to-date reflect no inclination to "fess up." To the contrary, Citigroup devotes itself to creating deceptions and securing lifelines. Late yesterday, Citi agreed to sell part of itself to the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority for $7.5 billion – a recapitalization deal which, conveniently, admits to no crisis, acknowledges no error, eliminates no executive positions, reduces no executive bonuses and solves absolutely no problems. The deal merely perpetuates the status quo – the same inept and broken status quo – a system that nourishes corrupt mediocrity, while squandering shareholder capital and crowding out legitimate economic endeavors.

To the extent that Citi's gimmicks and theatrics succeed, America's economy fails. No first-world economy can thrive on the power of price-fixing, bailouts and deception. The largest bank in the land should not be colluding with the Treasury Secretary to conduct a game of "hide the toxic waste."

Instead, it should be acknowledging its errors quickly, writing down its bad loans, and leading the crusade to restore liquidity to the financial system.

But Citigroup has not embraced HSBC's ethos. Citigroup has opted to obscure, rather than confess; to deny, rather than to deal. Citigroup, like so many other American corporations and institutions, knows all about rolling dice, but nothing about landing "snake eyes." The big American bank, like so many other American corporations and institutions, knows all about million-dollar options grants and compensation packages, but nothing about adversity or crisis, or how to prepare for either one.

The American economy may be facing a crisis it is not prepared to meet.

And because the American economy is not prepared for crisis, confidence in the American economic system is waning, confidence in the American economy is withering, and confidence in the American dream is waffling. The land of opportunity is losing is allure...just like the dollar.

Perhaps that's why an increasing number of Americans are shifting their assets overseas. Are these "early adopters" showing the way to the rest of us, or are they just "traitors" and "quacks?"

Let the readers decide...and after deciding, let the readers please send us their perspectives on the topic. We suspect this topic will draw an impassioned response from both sides of the ledger. And we'd love to publish these impassioned views in upcoming editions of the Rude Awakening...

----- Outstanding Investments: Out of Dollars, Into Gold -----

From Hulbert's #1 Ranked Advisory Letter of the Last 5 Years...

A Hidden Way To Buy Gold For Less Than A Penny Per Ounce

Even if $600 Gold hits $2,000 by the end of 2008...here's a hidden way you
can get in for less than one cent per ounce...Learn How Right Here .

--------------------------------------------------------------

Exit U.S .
By Mike Muehleck

One and a half million U.S. households are preparing to move out of the U.S. The vast majority of émigrés are in their 20s, 30s, and 40s. And some may not ever return.

No, we are not talking about the next major deployment of National Guard units to the Middle East. In fact, none of the emigrants are government workers or corporate employees leaving for temporary overseas assignments. These folks are malcontents or adventurers. They consist entirely of private citizens and their families packing up and leaving the good ol' USA solely at their own initiative.

This news comes from a Zogby International poll of 115,000 Americans conducted over the past two years. Bob Adams, CEO of New Global Initiatives, commissioned the poll when he realized that no reliable database tracks the movement of Americans out of the country. A recent Barron's article, written by Bob Adams, breaks down the Zogby/New Global Initiatives data as follows:

· 1.6 million (U.S. households) have already made the decision to leave
· 1.8 million are seriously considering and likely to leave
· 7.7 million are somewhat serious about leaving and may do so
· 3.0 million are seriously considering purchase of non-U.S. property
· 10.0 million are somewhat serious about purchase of non-U.S. property

Adding it all up, some 10% of all U.S. households are looking to leave the country, while another 11% are considering living outside the U.S. at least part time.

"That Can't Be Right"

"Incredulous" is the word that best describes the reaction of people when they hear Adams' conclusions. I brought the subject up the other night while barbequing and drinking beer with some American business people I know here in Bangkok. Even this well-traveled group greeted the poll results with skepticism. They asked, "How did he get thes data? Who did they interview?"

Maybe I was missing something, I thought to myself. So I decided to give Bob Adams a call. I reached him one evening at his home in Panama. "It's happening," Adams insisted, when asked about this new wave of emigration.

"And we really can't say exactly why."

While Adams' survey includes destinations all over the world, the survey's findings corroborate Adams' first-hand observations in Panama. Adams says the recent American immigrants to Panama are different from previous ones. Ten years ago, the typical American ex-pat in Panama was likely to be a retiree who had previously been in Panama. Perhaps they had been on a military assignment or with the Canal Zone administration. These folks tended to live in "American only" enclaves for social and security reasons and had fairly little interaction with the local population. These older ex-pats frequently used the words "tropical paradise" to describe why they moved to Panama.

But today's immigrants tend to be a lot younger, professionally employed, and more likely to meld into the international community than earlier transplants. These folks generally say they moved to Panama for adventure, a lower cost of living, or to escape the growing intrusiveness of the American political and legal systems.

Adams' interest in the topic of American emigration is the result of serendipity. Having lived and worked overseas for four decades, Adams decided it was time to settle down. He identified Panama as the best candidate. As he was preparing to move, he noticed the poor quality of Web sites catering to potential immigrants to Panama. So he set up his own site, RetirementWave.com. He intended to create an impromptu guide to assist like-minded people in the decision to move to Panama. But it quickly turned into an unpaid job responding to inquiries from interested parties worldwide. Adams realized he could reach an audience that extends beyond Central American real estate investors.

Why Do People Emigrate?

Why do people leave home for strange foreign lands? While a handful might claim to leave for political or religious reasons, most seek greater economic opportunity. All of my grandparents emigrated from Germany or Lithuania in the early 1900s. My wife's Chinese grandparents, for example, emigrated from China to Siam in the same generation. None moved to new lands because of a burning desire to be "free." They all moved because they wanted to make more money and thus enjoy a better life.

If you Google the word "emigration," and you'll mostly get sites that detail the emigration from Europe to the U.S. in the 19th and early 20th century. Google "American emigration" and you get a link to Adams' New Global Initiatives Web site and not much else. Most economic oriented sites only discuss the effects of legal and illegal immigration into the U.S. It's hard to find any thoughts about the economic, political, and demographic effects of younger Americans leaving for greener pastures overseas.

If people emigrate to find economic opportunity, might Adams' survey portend bad news for the U.S.? Current U.S. GDP is $44,000 per person versus Panama's $8,000. It seems unlikely that people are leaving for immediate financial gains. Still, Panama is a young country demographically, with a median age of 26. Panama's GDP grew at an 8% clip last year. It doesn't have the U.S. baby boomers' $55 trillion unfunded pension liability. Neither is it involved in difficult, expensive Middle East nation-building. So we should not be surprised if a growing number of 20-to -40-year-old Americans are willing and eager to abandon the wealth that "has been" to pursue the wealth that "might be."

Investors might want to consider a similar tactic.

[Joel's Note: Mike is a regular contributor to one of Agora Financial's flagship publications, Strategic Investment. If you are at all interested in expatriating some of your investments or find yourself questioning the short-term performance of the American economy, you will certainly be interested in Strategic Investment's report...it's not for the faint of heart. Read On Here.

----- Bulletin Board Elite: Positions Closing -----

The first time, I called it beginner's luck...

When it happened again, I called it a coincidence...

But after 9 stocks in a "secret" market one ace analyst was screening JUMPED to major exchanges - and major profits - in just a 12-month span, I knew he was hunting in the right place for huge gains.

In just the first six months of 2007, the AVERAGE top-tier stock in this all-but-unknown universe of securities gained 25,498%! Just $100 invested in the best of these on New Year's Day would've handed lucky shareholders gains of $409,900 before the Fourth of July...

RIGHT NOW, I'm offering those who respond a discounted chance to turn even a small investment into a small fortune on this ace analyst's best picks in this overlooked market.

But you must act quickly: Only a few spots remain in this revolutionary services ranks. Grab Your Seat Here .

-----------------------------------------------------------

Rude Endnote: If you would like to chime in with an impassioned response to today's column, please send your comments to the address below. We'll whittle the collection down and publish the very Rudest.

Cheers,