Always consult your investment professional before making any investment decision
Howe Street Week
Our weekly recap of media
Receive Howe Street Week FREE
email:

Gary’s Note: Daily oil production refuses to go much higher than 85 million barrels per day. The recession has given us a little breathing room, but when daily consumption starts to push up against daily supply again, the price of oil is going to start climbing back up. Byron King brings us the details.

The Energy Crisis Just a Bit Delayed

By Byron King
October 23, 2009
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
 

Eighty-five million barrels a day.

That’s the most that can be produced. So when recession causes a temporary decrease in world consumption, it can seem like those 85 million barrels are enough. But consumption is bound to resume its upward climb, while those 85 million barrels a day are all we get. The day of reckoning has just been delayed for a little bit.

“Can’t we get more than 85 million barrels?” some folks are bound to wonder. Let’s look into that.

~~~~~~~~~~~~Special~~~~~~~~~~~~

“The Bailout Loophole!”

How Congressional Mandate HR-3221 Could Pay You Up To $17,500 This Year

Missed by millions of Americans, this little-known LEGAL “loophole” could easily pay you up to $17,500 in income this year and every year...

For as long as it takes this market and the US economy to recover!

Get all the details here.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Those Stubborn “Peak” Curves

This week I was in Denver, attending the 2009 conference of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil & Gas (ASPO). Despite all the happy talk in the Big Media about how the oil situation is under control, I assure you that the oil situation is NOT under control.

The market meltdown and world recession of the past year has bought some time, or stolen some time may be a better way of saying it. All the “peak” curves are still out there, but are merely adjusted a bit to the right on the timelines.

As Marine Corps Gunnery Sergeant R. Lee Ermey likes to say on the television show Mail Call, “Wipe that smile off your face.” We’re staring at an energy problem that’s coming down the tracks like a runaway freight train. It’s just astonishing that more people don’t appreciate the looming impact of Peak Oil.

Meanwhile, the politicians are fooling around with the health care issue. Hmmm... I have some news for them. If you screw up energy, health care isn’t going to matter very much.

Oil Output Not Increasing

It might be a comforting thought to believe that world oil output can increase. Indeed, many policymakers in the U.S. and Europe apparently dream themselves to sleep at night pondering how the current oil volume of about 85 million barrels per day could move upward to, say, 95 million barrels per day — “if only the world oil industry were more efficient.”

Yeah, right. Except the global oil industry is not that model of dreamland efficiency. Sure, there are some bright spots. The big internationals like Exxon Mobil, Chevron, BP, Shell, etc. are good. There are some really good state oil firms like Brazil’s Petrobras and Norway’s StatoilHydro. Saudi Aramco is outstanding. These guys are all doing great work to keep the world’s pipelines and tankers filled.

But much of the rest of the world’s oil industry lacks the knack for capital discipline and crisp project execution. Venezuela’s oil industry is a basket case, what with the Chavez-led nationalizations and mass firings of recent years. Output is falling in Venezuela, and this from a nation with among the largest hydrocarbon reserves anywhere in the world.

Mexico’s national firm, Pemex, is nothing but a piggy bank for the politicians, who suck most of the investment capital away from the oil patch and into their own boondoggles. Thus is Pemex walking off a cliff of underinvestment, depletion and decline. According to Matt Simmons, Pemex may not be exporting any oil at all to the U.S. within 18-24 months.

~~~~~~~~~~~~Special~~~~~~~~~~~~

You Can Struggle for a 74% Gain…or Ease Your Way to 234%

Three powerful, irresistible forces are set to drive up this asset 74% in the next 18 months.

You can harness the power of those forces to generate 234% gains in even less time.

And I’ll show you how today for just $1…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Iran’s oil industry is in a slow death spiral, despite the occasional report of Chinese assistance with field development. Apparently, there’s a “Twitter Revolution” going on in Iran that includes people at the grass roots impeding the oil industry. Well, it worked to depose the Shah back in 1979. Perhaps the Iranians can rid themselves of their mullahs in a similar way.

Next door in Iraq, chaos reigns. According to Matt Simmons, the Iraqis “are in the dark about how to run their oil industry.” The Iraqi oil legislation is so burdensome that almost all players within the international energy industry are spurning Iraq, including the Chinese. Wow. When the Chinese won’t invest in your oil fields, there MUST be something wrong.

And so it goes. The bottom line is that we should expect a global oil shock by 2012, or earlier if global economic activity kicks into high gear. It should go without saying that despite any calamities that may come from such a thing, you would be very happy if you’d taken advantage of lower oil prices to stock up.

Until we meet again,
Byron King

P.S.: There are many ways to profit from more expensive oil. Deep-water mining technology, for example, is going to become absolutely crucial to oil production in the coming months. That’s why I have some very good deep-water mining technology companies in the ESI portfolio. Click here to get them too.

A Parting Shot

“No way in hell am I going to bowl.”

Your editor was fairly adamant about that.

Yesterday was the Agora Financial group outing. At lunchtime a few dozen Agora associates descended on Mustang Alley’s on the edge of Baltimore’s Little Italy for food, drink…and bowling! I was in the company of so many good-looking, smart and charming people that I wondered if they’d catch on and have me escorted out.

When in doubt, good bar patrons, just act like you belong. Odds are you’ll get away with it.

Normally I’m opposed to bowling. It just doesn’t seem dignified. So I’d resolved to avoid the bowling and enjoy the food and open bar.

But open bars have a way of dissolving resolutions along with dignity. By my third beer I’d exchanged my Chuck Tailors for a pair of bright red bowling shoes that had been worn by hundreds of strangers.

I also put to the test my conviction that strength generally trumps skill. Initially I tried to finesse the ball down the lane, but the ball ended up in the gutter…twice.

I am a clumsy bowler, Shooters, but I am a decent powerlifter. So I went with my strengths and started hurling the bowling ball underhand as hard as I could at the center pin. The ball wouldn’t hit the lane till it was about halfway down, but this brutish method resulted in several strikes…in a row!

Between strikes, I discussed sedition with Roving Whiskey Reporter Samantha Buker, just as I promised I would. We’re looking to make Whiskey bigger, faster, stronger and snarkier…to bring you more useful information and ideas along with some booze-tinged cheer.

After the party ended, Samantha and I hung around the bar but eventually wandered outside into the bright, cool afternoon.

“What an incredible day to be playing hooky from work,” she remarked. And I had to agree.

The Buke and I made our way a little farther south and east till we were in the heart of the Fells Point neighborhood.

Fells Point is a charming anachronism of tiny brick rowhouses and cobblestone streets, the sort of pleasing coastal industrial urbanism that will likely never be built again on this continent.

We settled in at the Waterfront Hotel, a well-known hangout of Agora associates. Samantha had mussels while your editor stuck with beer. At some point in the evening we were offered very good samples of gin and tonic by young men in Depression Era clothing.

Some hours later, the walk back home to our Mount Vernon neighborhood turned out to be surprisingly nice. After we left Fells, we stayed close to the edge of the Inner Harbor. The view was as lovely as the company. Who knew Baltimore could be so serene, Shooters? I am grudgingly coming to love this little burg more and more.

And a couple more thoughts from you Shooters on the origins of oil and production peak…

Gary – while I happen to be one of those people that believe oil is made through a process deep in the earth I think the discussion of how oil is made is irrelevant to the real issue. Peak Oil should be relabeled as Peak Cheap Oil.

The finds that are occurring today all appear to be very deep underground/deep undersea/deep under anywhere that will be difficult (read expensive) to reach. It will be of little consolation to the masses if the next great discovery produces oil at $500 per barrel. $25 a gallon gas will shut down the economy as quickly as any shortage and that is the direction we are heading. If the focus of the debate is on the disappearance of Cheap Oil I find few that will argue against me.

*****

Gary,

I am an investor in oil and gas, as well as wind power, and I believe it is a fallacy to state that we are past peak oil.  It would be more accurate to say we’re past peak CHEAP oil.  We have plenty of oil for the next 3 to 4 hundred years, but it will be increasingly expensive to extract it.

We are moving from sweet light crude, to heavy crude, then to oil that is entrapped within sands and shale.  With each step, it will become increasingly costly to extract and refine, but it is by no means scarce.

The other factor which will affect all this is that alternatives such as algae which can be used to produce oil at about $50 - $60 a barrel are being developed.  This is to say nothing of the wind, wave and solar technologies that are being put online every day.

My prediction is that as sweet light crude is becoming more scarce, we will see a gradual shift over the next 50 - 100 years to the alternatives I mention above, and perhaps some others that are not even on anyone’s radar yet (could we pull energy out of dark matter?)

And now for something a little different…

There’s something I keep looking for in Whisky but nobody ever seems to write about: with every Brad and Brittney who still has a job pumping every quarter they can find into their 401(k)s, why is there any mystery about the stock market “recovering”?
 
I know a lot of smart people, doctors, academics, pharmaceutical employees, researchers, really smart people with good incomes, supremely competent in their specialties.  When I ask them about the stock market they assure me with a confident smile that “it will come back”.  What everyone knows is that over the long run the market will return 10%, you just have to keep contributing as much money as you can manage to your 401(k).  It will be making money for you and by not paying taxes now that will be more equity making more money for you, and then, beautiful!, when you retire your tax rate will be lower and you will have never a care about money again.
 
Everyone knows this, right?  So where are those billions pumped automatically every month into mutual funds going if not into stocks?  Am I missing something?
 
Thanks

Good point. Let’s ponder this over the weekend. If you’d like to offer your opinion on 401(k)s or the stock market bounce, I’d be delighted to read them. You know where to reach me: gary@whiskeyandgunpowder.com.

I truly hope you enjoy your weekend.

Regards,
Gary Gibson
Managing Editor, Whiskey & Gunpowder


Whiskey & Gunpowder covers the spectrum of the many factors that affect economics including, but not limited to politics, technology, nature, history, and anything else our writers could possibly dream up. Sign up free today, click here.

© 2008 Agora Financial, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.